Profile picture of Yeonhee (Johnny) Cho

Johnny Cho

Ph.D. Candidate @ iSchool, University of Washington

Area for Research

Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) Educational Technology Game-based Learning Augmented/Virtual Reality Media Literacy (Misinformation) AI Literacy Social Emotional Learning Participatory Design

πŸ”– Tool Index

A curated collection of AI-powered academic tools for research workflows.

πŸ”Ž Elicit

https://elicit.com
Quick, early-stage literature scanning. It saves time with summaries, but I treat it as a mapping tool, not a replacement for reading the originals.

🧭 ResearchRabbit

https://www.researchrabbit.ai
Great for visualizing citation networks and exploring a field’s landscape, but it works best when you already have a seed paper to start from.

πŸ“š Semantic Scholar

https://www.semanticscholar.org
A solid free academic search engine with helpful AI features, though its coverage feels stronger in STEM than in humanities or social sciences.

πŸ“Š Scite

https://scite.ai
Very useful for seeing whether a paper is supported or criticized by others, but I still double-check because the classifications aren’t always perfect.

πŸ—Ί Connected Papers

https://www.connectedpapers.com
Excellent for quickly understanding a research area from one key paper, though the free version is quite limited.

πŸ•° Litmaps

https://www.litmaps.com
Helpful for tracking how a field evolves over time, but it takes some effort to learn the interface and set it up well.

🌐 OpenAlex

https://openalex.org/
Great for open, large-scale academic data exploration, though it’s clearly more for researchers than for casual users.

🧠 Consensus

https://consensus.app
Useful for quick, evidence-based answers to research questions, but complex topics often get oversimplified.

πŸ” Perplexity

https://www.perplexity.ai
Good for fast fact-finding with sources, but since it mixes web and academic content, I’m cautious about using it for serious research.

🌐 Liner

https://getliner.com
Good for highlighting and source-checking web content, though it’s more for general research than academic literature.

πŸ“„ SciSpace

https://www.scispace.com
Very helpful for asking questions directly about a PDF, though I never fully trust it without checking the original text.

πŸ—‚ Scholarcy

https://www.scholarcy.com
Great for rapid screening of many papers, but the summaries can feel too surface-level for deeper understanding.

🧾 Explainpaper

https://www.explainpaper.com
Nice for simplifying difficult paragraphs, but it works better for small sections than for understanding a whole paper.

πŸ“Ž ChatPDF

https://www.chatpdf.com
Useful for quick, interactive reading, but long or complex papers often get oversimplified.

πŸ“Ž AskYourPDF

https://askyourpdf.com
Good for quick Q&A with PDFs, but it can miss nuances in longer or more technical papers.

πŸ““ NotebookLM

https://notebooklm.google.com
Interesting for working with multiple documents at once, though it still feels more experimental than research-focused.

✍️ Keenious

https://www.keenious.com
Nice for getting references while writing, though I’m cautious about uploading drafts and trusting the recommendations too much.

πŸ—‚ Rayyan

https://www.rayyan.ai
Great for managing systematic review screening, but it’s more about workflow than about AI-driven insight.

🧠 Undermind

https://undermind.ai
I like that it explains why papers are related, but it still feels like an emerging tool with limited coverage.